If
I can speak about ‘what is seen’, why
shouldn't anyone else speak about it? –
But I have a feeling that only I can; if I assume that others also speak
about what normally I should call my visual image there seems to me to be
something
wrong with
this assumption.
If ‘what I see’ has nothing to do with a particular
person why should I feel that there's something wrong in assuming
that anybody might talk about it i.e.
mean
it when he speaks?
Then of course I can't tell them what I see nor they me what
they see any more than I can tell myself what I see.
But they could make conjectures as to what might happen in future in our
visual field.
In the normal game I say: “I don't know what
they see, they've got to say what they see”, – but in the game I'm
con
sidering they would as much know what I see as
my hand can wri
te down what my mouth can say.
And their different conjecture would be like conjectures made by
myself at different times.
Can my mouth tell my hand what I see in order that my hand should be able
to write it down?