Collapse

Annotate using Feed The Pundit

Recognising the object as the same you had before. But if we use

Ms-166,14r

14

the words ‘recognise’ & ‘same’ he must be justified in saying that he recognises the object as the same. Can his recognition be infallible? No; for he may be || can go wrong in the use of the word ‘same’. || No, for we may say that he goes wrong in the application of the word ‘same’.

(2015–) Wittgenstein Source Bergen Nachlass Edition (WS-BNE). Edited by the Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen under the direction of Alois Pichler. In: Wittgenstein Source, curated by Alois Pichler (2009–) and Joseph Wang-Kathrein (2020–). (N) Bergen: WAB.

To cite this element you can use the following URL:

BOXVIEW: http://www.wittgensteinsource.org/BTE/Ms-166,13v[4]et14r[1]_n

RDF: http://www.wittgensteinsource.org/BTE/Ms-166,13v[4]et14r[1]_n/rdf

JSON: http://www.wittgensteinsource.org/BTE/Ms-166,13v[4]et14r[1]_n/json