• Collapse

  • Annotate using Feed The Pundit
  • Ms-301 Diplomatic transcription
  • Ms-301,10[2]
  • prev
  • next
  • Drag

  ​ 
  (2) The point can here be brought out as follows.
  Take φa, & φA: , where & ask what is meant by saying “There is a thing in φa, & a complex in φA”?
  (1) means: (∃x). φx . x = a


  (2) means φ [aRb] = ψa . ψb . aRb Def.

x A = aRb Def.



  We then get (∃x,y,(ξRη) . φx . φy . xRy


(∃x,ψξ). φA = ψx . φx

Ms-301,11
 

(2015–) Wittgenstein Source Bergen Nachlass Edition (WS-BNE). Edited by the Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen under the direction of Alois Pichler. In: Wittgenstein Source, curated by Alois Pichler (2009–) and Joseph Wang-Kathrein (2020–). (N) Bergen: WAB.




To cite this element you can use the following URL:


BOXVIEW: http://www.wittgensteinsource.org/BTE/Ms-301,10[2]_d

RDF: http://www.wittgensteinsource.org/BTE/Ms-301,10[2]_d/rdf

JSON: http://www.wittgensteinsource.org/BTE/Ms-301,10[2]_d/json