Collapse

Annotate using Feed The Pundit

It's very important to realise that when you have 2 different relations (a,b)_R (c,d)_S this does not establish a correlation between a & c, & b & d, or a & d, [or|&] b & c: there is no correlation whatsoever thus established. Of course, in the case of 2 pairs of terms united by same relation, there is a correlation. This shews that the theory which held that a relational fact contained the terms & relations united by a copula (ε₂) is untrue; for if this were so there would be a

Ms-301,28

correspondence between the terms of different relations.

(2015–) Wittgenstein Source Bergen Nachlass Edition (WS-BNE). Edited by the Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen under the direction of Alois Pichler. In: Wittgenstein Source, curated by Alois Pichler (2009–) and Joseph Wang-Kathrein (2020–). (N) Bergen: WAB.

To cite this element you can use the following URL:

BOXVIEW: http://www.wittgensteinsource.org/BTE/Ms-301,27[3]et28[1]_d

RDF: http://www.wittgensteinsource.org/BTE/Ms-301,27[3]et28[1]_d/rdf

JSON: http://www.wittgensteinsource.org/BTE/Ms-301,27[3]et28[1]_d/json