Collapse

Annotate using Feed The Pundit

It is easy to suppose that only such symbols are complex as contain names of objects objects, & ˇthat accordingly “(∃x,φ)․φx” or “(∃x,ˇR,y).xRy” must be simple. It is then natural to call the first of these the name of a form, the second the name of a relation. But in that case what is the meaning of (e.g.) “~(∃x,y).xRy”? Can we put “not” before a name?

Ts-201a1,b2

2

(2015–) Wittgenstein Source Bergen Nachlass Edition (WS-BNE). Edited by the Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen under the direction of Alois Pichler. In: Wittgenstein Source, curated by Alois Pichler (2009–) and Joseph Wang-Kathrein (2020–). (N) Bergen: WAB.

To cite this element you can use the following URL:

BOXVIEW: http://www.wittgensteinsource.org/BTE/Ts-201a1,b1[6]_d

RDF: http://www.wittgensteinsource.org/BTE/Ts-201a1,b1[6]_d/rdf

JSON: http://www.wittgensteinsource.org/BTE/Ts-201a1,b1[6]_d/json