Collapse

Annotate using Feed The Pundit

I

When we say A judges that etc., then we have to mention a whole proposition which A judges. It will not do either to mention only its constituents, or its constituents and form, but not in the proper order. This shows that a proposition itself must occur in the statement that it is judged; however, for instance, “not-p” may be explained, the question, “What is negated” must have a meaning.

* Russell – for instance imagines every fact as a spatial complex.

Ts-201a2,a3

3

(2015–) Wittgenstein Source Bergen Nachlass Edition (WS-BNE). Edited by the Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen under the direction of Alois Pichler. In: Wittgenstein Source, curated by Alois Pichler (2009–) and Joseph Wang-Kathrein (2020–). (N) Bergen: WAB.

To cite this element you can use the following URL:

BOXVIEW: http://www.wittgensteinsource.org/BTE/Ts-201a2,a2[4]_n

RDF: http://www.wittgensteinsource.org/BTE/Ts-201a2,a2[4]_n/rdf

JSON: http://www.wittgensteinsource.org/BTE/Ts-201a2,a2[4]_n/json