• Collapse

  • Annotate using Feed The Pundit
  • Ts-310 Diplomatic transcription
  • Facsimile
  • Ts-310,6[2]et7[1]
  • prev
  • next
  • Drag

  ​ 
     (Remark: It has been suggested that such words as “there”,
Ts-310,7
7.
“here”, “now”, “this” are the “real proper names” as opposed to what in ordinary life we call proper names, & in the view I am referring to, can only be called so crudely. There is a widespread tendency to regard what in ordinary life is called a proper name only as a rough approximation of what ideally could be called so. Compare Russell's idea of the “individual”. He talks of individuals as the ultimate costituents of reality, but says that it is difficult to say which things are individuals. The idea is that further analysis has to reveal this. We, on the other hand, introduced the idea of a proper name in a language in which it was applied to what in ordinary life we call “objects”, “things” (“building stones”).
 

(2015–) Wittgenstein Source Bergen Nachlass Edition (WS-BNE). Edited by the Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen under the direction of Alois Pichler. In: Wittgenstein Source, curated by Alois Pichler (2009–) and Joseph Wang-Kathrein (2020–). (N) Bergen: WAB.




To cite this element you can use the following URL:


BOXVIEW: http://www.wittgensteinsource.org/BTE/Ts-310,6[2]et7[1]_d

RDF: http://www.wittgensteinsource.org/BTE/Ts-310,6[2]et7[1]_d/rdf

JSON: http://www.wittgensteinsource.org/BTE/Ts-310,6[2]et7[1]_d/json