• Collapse

  • Annotate using Feed The Pundit
  • Ts-310
  • Facsimile
  • Ts-310,19[3]et20[1] Diplomatic transcription
  • prev
  • next
  • Drag

   
     In 1) B learnt to bring a building stone on hearing the word “column!” called out. We could imagine what happened in such a case to be this: In B's mind the word called out brought up an image of a column, say; the training had, as we should say, established this association. B takes up that building stone which conforms to his image. ‒ ‒ But was this necessarily what happened? If the training could bring it about that the idea or image – – automatically – – arose in B's mind, why shouldn't it bring about B's actions without the intervention of an image?
Ts-310,20
20.
This would only come to a slight variation of the associative mechanism. Bear in mind that the image which is brought up by the word is not arrived at by a rational process (but if it is, this only pushes our argument further back), but that this case is strictly comparable with that of a mechanism in which a button is pressed and an indicator plate appears. In fact this sort of mechanism can be used instead of that of association.

(2015–) Wittgenstein Source Bergen Nachlass Edition (WS-BNE). Edited by the Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen under the direction of Alois Pichler. In: Wittgenstein Source, curated by Alois Pichler (2009–) and Joseph Wang-Kathrein (2020–). (N) Bergen: WAB.




To cite this element you can use the following URL:


BOXVIEW: http://www.wittgensteinsource.org/BTE/Ts-310,19[3]et20[1]_n

RDF: http://www.wittgensteinsource.org/BTE/Ts-310,19[3]et20[1]_n/rdf

JSON: http://www.wittgensteinsource.org/BTE/Ts-310,19[3]et20[1]_n/json